A FOURTH DIMENSION ! WOW ! COME FORTH
Want to change the World?
Like Willie Wonka says, "There's nothing TO IT"
and you can take that in two different ways
Concerning the fourth dimension......read what Neville Goddard had to say about it.
Man does not know exactly what is meant by a dimensionally larger world, and would no doubt deny the existence of a dimensionally larger self. He is quite familiar with the three dimensions of length, width and height, and he feels that if there were a fourth dimension, it should be just as obvious to him as the dimensions of length, width and height. A dimension is not a line; it is any way in which a thing can be measured that is entirely different from all other ways. That is, to measure a solid fourth-dimensionally, we simply measure it in any direction except that of its length, width and height.
Is there another way of measuring an object other than those of its length, width and height? Time measures my life without employing the three dimensions of length, width and height. There is no such thing as a instantaneous object. Its appearance and disappearance are measurable. It endures for a definite length of time. We can measure its life span without using the dimensions of length, width and height. Time is definitely a fourth way of measuring an object.
The more dimensions an object has, the more substantial and real it becomes. A straight line, which lies entirely in one dimension, acquires shape, mass and substance by the addition of dimensions. What new quality would time, the fourth dimension, give which would make it just as vastly superior to solids as solids are to surfaces and surfaces are to lines? Time is a medium for changes in experience because all changes take time. The new quality is changeability.
Observe that if we bisect a solid, its cross section will be a surface; by bisecting a surface, we obtain a line; and by bisecting a line, we get a point. This means that a point is but a cross section of a line, which is, in turn, but a cross section of a surface, which is, in turn if carried to its logical conclusion, but a cross section of a four-dimensional object.
We cannot avoid the inference that all three-dimensional objects are but cross sections of four-dimensional bodies. Which means; when I meet you, I meet a cross section of the four-dimensional you-the four-dimensional self that is not seen. To see the four-dimensional self I must see every cross section or moment of your life from birth to death and see them all as coexisting. My focus should take in the entire array of sensory impressions which you have experienced on earth plus those you might encounter. I should see them, not in the order in which they were experienced by you, but as a present whole. Because change is the characteristic of the fourth dimension, I should see them in a state of flux as a living, animated whole.
If we have all this clearly fixed in our minds, what does it mean to us in this three-dimensional world? It means that, if we can move along time's length, we can see the future and alter it as we so desire. This world, which we think so solidly real, is a shadow out of which and beyond which we may at any time pass. It is an abstraction from a more fundamental and dimensionally larger world-a more fundamental world abstracted from a still more fundamental and dimensionally larger world, and so on to infinity. The absolute is unattainable by any means or analysis, no matter how many dimensions we add to the world.
Man can prove the existence of a dimensionally larger world simply by focusing his attention on an invisible state and imagining that he sees and feels it. If he remains concentrated in this state, his present environment will pass away, and he will awaken in a dimensionally larger world where the object of his contemplation will be seen as a concrete objective reality. Intuitively I feel that, were he to abstract his thoughts from the dimensionally larger world and retreat still farther within his mind, he would again bring about an externalization of time. He would discover that every time he retreats into his inner mind and brings about an externalization of time, space become dimensionally larger. And he would, therefore, conclude that both time and space are serial, and that the drama of life is but the climbing of a multitudinous dimensional time block.
Scientists will one day explain why there is a Serial Universe. But in practice how we use this Serial Universe to change the future is more important. To change the future, we need only concern ourselves with two worlds in the infinite series, the world we know by reason of our bodily organs, and the world we perceive independently of our bodily organs.
Men believe in the reality of the external world because they do not know how to focus and condense their powers to penetrate its thin crust.

Help




I have read theories predictive of planetary radiant energy gain that can only be explained by five dimensions. Perhaps this is the out of the box thinking necessary to gain an understanding of magnetism, gravity, atomic particles, and to transform the world from fear to love.
I suspect it is. It is certainly a largely unexplored frontier. What an adventure lies ahead of us.
Diana,
I am reading a book now called The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot that explains in relatively easy to read descriptions subquantum physics. David Bohm (the physicist he writes about, who worked through some of his ideas with Albert Einstein) describes reality as a “holomovement” from the explicate to the implicate - a constant unfolding and enfolding - in a seamless continuum.
Your remarks about “a state of flux as a living, animated whole” fit in well with his conception. Also “It is an abstraction from a more fundamental and dimensionally larger world-a more fundamental world abstracted from a still more fundamental and dimensionally larger world, and so on to infinity.” He feels there is no final, complete theory for infinity.
All the best -
Deborah
Yes, I have read “The Holographic Universe” before and I plan on re-reading it. So many of the scientific community are beginning to show us God (God peeking at them through their discoveries) and they are making for a greater understanding of Consciousness.
But it flys in the face of some who want to keep up the sacrificing to please an angry God or do enough good works to earn brownie points with God. I think our leap of faith will be to KNOW moreso than to DO. The KNOWING will be the doing.
I am so glad for Zaadz because of getting to meet other minds, like yours and so many others here who write blogs. Some of the blogs, even the ones I don't agree with like some of Amadon's blogs, have greatly benefited me because I find people like yourself. So everything works for the good. I am reading a book by Walter Russell called “The Secret of Light” in which God says “Evil is both good and necessary” and you know I can relate to the truth of that, whereas there was a time I would have scoffed at the very idea. We really have to stretch ourselves in our reasoning of a matter and it really helps if we are not too rigid.